Categories
Leadership Positive Change

The Devil and the Millennium

…the Devil made me do it

As we enter a new year, 2022, many individuals cannot keep from speculating what position the Devil will be playing in it.  However, a closer inspection of the news media and the Internet services reveals almost no mention of him.  One can find more information about Donald Trump, the January 6 insurrection riot in Washington DC, Covid-19, Omicron, local city councils denying the housing crisis, and the New York Yankees and LA Dodgers than on the Devil.

How humiliating for one whose name was once enough to make the hair of kings and queens stand up in horror, of which Saint Augustine said, “The human race is the Devil’s fruit tree, his own property, from which he may pick his fruit.”

Appreciating his demise, we must put ourselves someplace in Western Europe in the year

999, as the second millennium was about to begin.  During that time the Devil was everywhere.  He hid behind church doors and frolicked through castles and cottages.  In addition, his pranks and tempting of humans were articulated in sermons, on theatre stages, on canvas, books and in everyday conversation.  In addition, no part of daily life eluded him.  The Devil prowled outside every oral cavity of the human body, anticipating an opportunity to enter the human soul inside, that is why to this day we say “God bless you” when we hear someone sneeze.

Whatever he did, he was on everyone’s tongue, and he went by many names: Satan, Lucifer, Beelzebub, Belial, Mastema, the Prince of Darkness, and the Lord of Lies.  In addition, the Scripture refers to him as the Accuser, the Evil One, and the Prince of this World.

Today the average person with no theological background envisions the Devil as a sleek, dark-complexioned male figure, with black chin-whiskers, little horns, and cloven hooves, conceivably with a foxy glint in his eye and a trace of a foreign accent, but overall handsome.

The Old Testament composed between the tenth and third centuries B.C., has little trace of the Devil with a capital D, and in earlier books, none.  The serpent who tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden was later identified by Jewish rabbis and Christian church fathers with the Devil, the principal Evil; but in the third chapter of Genesis as written, he is only a snake.  Ancient Hebrew had a noun; Satan, meaning “obstructor” or “accuser,” and several Satans appear in the Old Testament being sent by God on different errands.  

When the Old Testament was translated into Greek beginning in the third century B.C., Satan was rendered diabolos, “adversary,” from which came the Latin diabolus, French diable, German Teufel, English “devil.”  The first time the word appears with a capital S, to define a particular person, is in the Book of Job.

The Devil has had to adjust his ways in modern times.  In addition, America, like the modern world in general, has lost its sense of evil.  Perhaps, he is not dead after all; he may only be in hiding.  It is the policy of the Devil to persuade us that there is no Devil.  The Devil, after all, if he is anything, is the personification of evil, and no one can deny that there is plenty of evil around even in today’s comparative peace and prosperity.

In contemplation, there were no devils running Auschwitz, only human beings.  Pledges have been taken that these atrocities will not occur again.  That the insurrection-riot at DC is an once occurrence. However, our common sense tells us that we will go on performing wicked deeds of one sort or another until the end of the world. 

So, if a sleek individual approaches you, and you take his advice, you will probably be making a bad decision.  Despite everything, if caught performing a wicked deed, we can always say…. the

The devil made me do it.

The power of a movement lies in the fact that it can indeed change the habits of people. This change is not the result of FORCE but of dedication, of moral persuasion, Ethical Behavior, and Political Respect and Equity.

Dr. Paul A. Rodriguez

Categories
Housing Laws RHNA SCAG

New Housing Element Adoption and Rezoning Legislation

New Housing Element Adoption and Rezoning Legislation Governor Newsom recently signed Assembly Bill (AB) 1398 (Bloom), which will affect housing element rezoning deadlines for all California jurisdictions –including those within the SCAG region. Below are the primary changes resulting from AB 1398: Four-year Cycle Requirement Removed Sixth cycle housing elements within the SCAG region are due to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) by Oct. 15. Prior to AB 1398, jurisdictions that did not adopt a housing element within 120 days of this date (by Feb. 11, 2022) were required to develop a housing element every four years instead of eight. AB 1398 has removed the requirement for a four-year housing element regardless of when a housing element is adopted by a jurisdiction. New Rezoning Completion Date With the enactment of AB 1398, jurisdictions that adopt a compliant housing element by Feb. 11, 2022, will still have three years after adoption to complete necessary rezoning. However, jurisdictions that do not have an adopted housing element found to be in substantial compliance by HCD by Feb. 11, 2022, must complete all necessary rezoning within one year of the housing element due date. For the SCAG region, this means that jurisdictions that do not adopt a compliant housing element by Feb. 11, 2022, must complete all rezoning by Oct. 15, 2022.
Jurisdictions that do not complete necessary rezoning by Oct. 15, 2022, may trigger additional housing element review by HCD and potential removal of compliance status or litigation under AB 72. Jurisdictions that adopt more than one year after Oct. 15, 2021, cannot receive housing element compliance status from HCD until the rezoning is complete. HCD is currently developing guidelines for AB 1398 and SCAG will continue to monitor and facilitate discussions regarding housing element compliance with HCD.
Categories
Housing Laws RHNA SCAG

Housing Element: Local and National Housing Crisis

We are in the middle of a housing and homelessness crisis both statewide and here in Los Angeles County. California is estimated to need an additional 3.5 million homes by 2025 to meet the demand. In our region, many residents struggle to pay rent and cannot afford to buy homes in neighborhoods where they grew up. More people are experiencing homelessness as a result. Our communities need a wide range of housing types (apartments, townhouses, and condos, etc.) and size to meet different needs. The amount and types of housing in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County are not meeting the overall housing need. The Housing Element for 2021-2029 will help address this need. 

What is the Housing Element?

The Housing Element is the County’s housing policy guide for the unincorporated areas – areas that are NOT within any city. The County of Los Angeles, along with all California cities and counties, is required to update its Housing Element every eight years. The Housing Element identifies housing conditions and needs and establishes the County’s housing strategy through goals and policies. It also includes programs to ensure decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing for current and future residents of the unincorporated areas, including those with special needs. The County is currently updating its Housing Element for 2021-2029.

Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA)

The foundation for the Housing Element is the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), in which the State estimates each region’s housing needs for the upcoming eight years. State law requires each city and county to plan for the estimated number of homes for its current and future residents through land use and zoning regulations. These regulations include the number of homes per acre that are allowed on a parcel, and the allowable housing types (such as single-family homes, apartments, and townhouses).

The RHNA for the unincorporated areas for 2021-2029 is approximately 90,000 homes, which is the largest number the County has ever had. Neither property owners nor the County is required to build these housing units.

Sites Inventory

Per State law, the Housing Element must include a Sites Inventory to show that there is enough land in the unincorporated areas where the 90,000 new homes are allowed to be built under current land use and zoning regulations. In general, the Sites Inventory includes two types of sites:

  • Vacant sites where one single-family home is allowed per parcel; and
  • Vacant or underused sites where multi-family housing development (e.g. apartments and townhouses) is allowed.

An important step in the selection process for the Sites Inventory is to consider whether a site is developable and suitable for a particular housing type, such as a single-family home or a multi-family housing development. Environmentally sensitive or naturally constrained areas, as shown on the map below, are not suitable for multi-family housing development. 

Sites that are outside of environmentally sensitive or naturally constrained areas must meet several other requirements to be included in the Sites Inventory for multi-family housing development, including an allowable density of 30 or more units per acre. Also, these sites must have the potential for more homes to be built compared to what is currently on the ground.

Sites that are in the draft inventory are shown on the map below. As the Sites Inventory falls short of the goal to have enough land zoned for the 90,000 new homes, the Housing Element includes a rezoning program to allow for more housing, as required by State law. 

Rezoning Program – Site Selection

Per State law, the Housing Element Update rezoning program must include a list of sites that will be rezoned between 2021-2024. The site selection process involves many factors. Together, these factors address two questions:

  1. Where should more housing, especially multi-family housing types (e.g. apartments and townhouses) be built in the unincorporated areas?
  2. How likely is a particular site to be suitable for housing development in the upcoming eight years?  

Where should more housing, especially multi-family housing be built?

When determining where to rezone to allow for more housing, especially multi-family housing types such as apartments and townhouses, the main goals are to encourage infill development in urbanized areas, and to prioritize public health, safety, and equity.

Sites in environmentally sensitive or naturally constrained areas, such as the Coastal Zone, Fire Hazard Severity Zones, Significant Ecological Areas, and Hillside Management Areas are not selected for rezoning as these areas are not suitable for multi-family housing development.

Sites that are outside of environmentally sensitive or naturally constrained areas are then prioritized based on additional locational criteria. Sites that are located near transit, amenities, and services, and within areas served by existing infrastructure (e.g. public water and sewer systems) are considered more suitable for multi-family housing development and thus rezoning.

Also, historic, discriminatory land use and housing policies have resulted in disadvantaged communities with concentrated poverty. To encourage diverse, inclusive, and mixed-income neighborhoods, sites that are located in areas with more resources and opportunities in terms of educational attainment, employment, and economic mobility as identified by the State are also prioritized for rezoning.

How likely is a particular site to be suitable for housing development in the upcoming eight years?

Per State law, sites that are included in the rezoning program must be suitable for a housing development during the upcoming eight years. In other words, the site must be developable, with sufficient water, sewer, and other utilities available to support housing development. If a site is not vacant, the following factors are considered to determine whether the site will likely be suitable for more housing in the upcoming eight years:

  • Age of Existing Buildings: Property owners and developers are more likely to redevelop the site if the existing buildings are relatively older. We use 20 years as the threshold for existing non-residential buildings, and 50 years as the threshold for existing residential buildings;
  • Land Value vs. Improvement Value: If the land is more valuable than the existing improvement, the property owner is more likely to redevelop the site with a more intense use, such as multi-family housing development; and
  • Contamination: Sites that are or have been contaminated (e.g. gas stations) often require a lot of money and time for clean-up. These sites are unlikely to be suitable for housing development in the near future.

In addition, State law requires that the rezoning must allow at least 16 additional homes to be built on a given property compared to what is currently on the site.

Categories
RHNA SCAG

TACKLING CALIFORNIA’S HOUSING CRISIS – HOUSING STRATEGIES TO HELP ADDRESS THE HOMELESSNESS CRISIS 🏘

Click below for information on webinar

Tackling California’s Housing Crisis – Housing Strategies to Help Address the Homelessness Crisis – Southern California Association of Governments

Categories
SCAG Transportation

SCAG Using Data to Craft Safety Narrative High Injury Networks

Click Link for Information

Categories
Democracy Digital Divide General. Plan Housing Laws Infrastructure Positive Change

Current California AB (Assembly Bills) and SB (Senate Bills) for Review🥸

Find current AB and SB of California. The Bills cover WIFI, housing, homelessness, and many more. Review and Click the tab for direct information from the State legislature.

AB 14

AB 14   (Aguiar-Curry D)   Communications: broadband services: California Advanced Services Fund.
Current law establishes the State Department of Education in state government, and vests the department with specified powers and duties relating to the state’s public school system. This bill would authorize local educational agencies to report to the department their pupils’ estimated needs for computing devices and internet connectivity adequate for at-home learning. The bill would require the department, in consultation with the Public Utilities Commission, to compile that information and to annually post that compiled information on the department’s internet website.
AB 17   (Cooper D)   Peace officers: disqualification from employment.
Would disqualify a person from being a peace officer if the person has been discharged from the military for committing an offense that would have been a felony if committed in California or if the person has been certified as a peace officer and has had that certification revoked by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training.
AB 34   (Muratsuchi D)   Broadband for All Act of 2022.
Would enact the Broadband for All Act of 2022, which, if approved by the voters, would authorize the issuance of bonds in the amount of $10,000,000,000 pursuant to the State General Obligation Bond Law to support the 2022 Broadband for All Program that would be administered by the department for purposes of providing financial assistance for projects to deploy broadband infrastructure and broadband internet access services.
AB 215   (Chiu D)   Housing element: regional housing need: relative progress determination.
the Planning and Zoning Law requires a city or county to adopt a general plan for land use development within its boundaries that includes, among other things, a housing element. That law requires the Department of Housing and Community Development to determine whether the housing element is in substantial compliance with specified provisions of that law. This bill, starting with the 6th housing element revision, would require the department to determine the relative progress toward meeting regional housing needs of each jurisdiction and council of governments, as specified. The bill would require the department to make this determination based on the information contained in the annual reports submitted by each jurisdiction, as specified. The bill would require the department to make this determination for all housing and for lower-income housing by dividing the applicable entity’s progress toward meeting its share of the regional housing need by its prorated share of the regional housing need, as specified.
AB 377   (Rivas, Robert  D)   Water quality: impaired waters.
Would require, by January 1, 2023, the State Water Resources Control Board and regional boards to prioritize enforcement of all water quality standard violations that are causing or contributing to an exceedance of a water quality standard in surface water of the state. The bill would require the state board and regional boards, by January 1, 2025, to evaluate impaired state surface waters and report to the Legislature a plan to bring all water segments into attainment by January 1, 2050. The bill would require the state board and regional boards to update the report with a progress summary to the Legislature every 5 years. The bill would create the Waterway Recovery Account in the Waste Discharge Permit Fund and would make money in the Waterway Recovery Account available for the state board to expend, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to bring impaired water segments into attainment in accordance with the plan.
AB 500   (Ward D)   Local planning: coastal development: affordable housing.
Would require the California Coastal Commission to conduct and complete a study on or before January 1, 2023, that identifies recommendations for policy changes that advance affordable housing in the coastal zone. The bill would provide that the study may include recommendations regarding the commission’s authority related to the development of lower-income housing and recommendations regarding streamlining of local government and commission review of affordable housing projects.
AB 585   (Rivas, Luz D)   Climate change: Extreme Heat and Community Resilience Program.
Would establish the Extreme Heat and Community Resilience Program for the purpose of coordinating state efforts and supporting local and regional efforts to mitigate the impacts of, and reduce the public health risks of, extreme heat and the urban heat island effect, and would require the Office of Planning and Research to administer the program through the Integrated Climate Adaptation and Resiliency Program.
AB 718   (Cunningham R)   Peace officers: investigations of misconduct.
Would require a law enforcement agency or oversight agency to complete its investigation into an allegation of the use of force resulting in death or great bodily injury, sexual assault, discharge of a firearm, or dishonesty relating to the reporting, investigation, or prosecution of a crime or misconduct by another peace officer or custodial officer, despite the peace officer’s or custodial officer’s voluntary separation from the employing agency. The bill would require the investigation to result in a finding that the allegation is either sustained, not sustained, unfounded or exonerated, as defined. The bill would also require an agency other than an officer’s employing agency that conducts an investigation of these allegations to disclose its findings with the employing agency no later than the conclusion of the investigation.
AB 816   (Chiu D)   Homelessness: Housing Trust Fund: housing projects.
Current federal law requires the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to establish a Housing Trust Fund to provide grants to states to increase the supply of rental housing for extremely low and very low-income families, including homeless families, and homeownership for extremely low and very low-income families. Current law requires the department to collaborate with the California Housing Finance Agency to develop an allocation plan to demonstrate how the funds will be distributed, based on the priority housing needs identified in the state’s consolidated plan, and to convene a stakeholder process to inform the development of the plan. Current law requires the allocation plan and program guidelines to prioritize projects based on enumerated factors such as the extent to which project rents are affordable. The department is required to submit this plan to the Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development and the Senate Transportation and Housing Committees 30 days after receipt of the federal funds. This bill would require the department to prioritize funding for projects that serve people experiencing homelessness, to the extent that a sufficient number of projects exist.
SB
SB 28   (Caballero D)   Rural Broadband and Digital Infrastructure Video Competition Reform Act of 2021.
Current law establishes in state government the Department of Technology and makes it responsible for approval and oversight of information technology projects. Current law requires the Director of General Services to compile and maintain an inventory of state-owned real property that may be available for lease to providers of wireless telecommunications services for location of wireless telecommunications facilities. This bill, the Rural Broadband and Digital Infrastructure Video Competition Reform Act of 2021, would similarly require the Department of Technology, in collaboration with other state agencies, to compile an inventory of state-owned resources, as defined, that may be available for use in the deployment of broadband networks in rural, unserved, and underserved communities, except as specified. The bill would require the department to collaborate on the development of standardized agreement provisions to enable those state-owned resources to be leased or licensed for that purpose.
SB 278   (Leyva D)   Public Employees’ Retirement System: disallowed compensation: benefit adjustments.
The California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) generally requires a public retirement system, as defined, to modify its plan or plans to comply with the act. PEPRA, among other things, establishes new defined benefit formulas and caps on pensionable compensation. This bill would establish new procedures under PERL for cases in which PERS determines that the benefits of a member or annuitant are, or would be, based on disallowed compensation that conflicts with PEPRA and other specified laws and thus impermissible under PERL. The bill would also apply these procedures retroactively to determinations made on or after January 1, 2017, if an appeal has been filed and the employee member, survivor, or beneficiary has not exhausted their administrative or legal remedies. At the threshold, after determining that compensation for an employee member reported by the state, school employer, or a contracting agency is disallowed, the bill would require the applicable employer to discontinue the reporting of the disallowed compensation.
SB 344   (Hertzberg D)   Homeless shelters grants: pets and veterinary services.
Would require the Department of Housing and Community Development subject to an appropriation in the annual Budget Act, to develop and administer a program to award grants to qualified homeless shelters, as described, for the provision of shelter, food, and basic veterinary services for pets owned by people experiencing homelessness. The bill would authorize the department to use up to 5% of the funds appropriated in the annual Budget Act for those purposes for its costs in administering the program.
SB 556   (Dodd D)   Street light poles, traffic signal poles: small wireless facilities attachments.
Would prohibit a local government or local publicly owned electric utility from unreasonably denying the leasing or licensing of its street light poles or traffic signal poles to communications service providers for the purpose of placing small wireless facilities on those poles. The bill would require that street light poles and traffic signal poles be made available for the placement of small wireless facilities under fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory fees, as provided. The bill would authorize a local government or local publicly owned electric utility to condition access to its street light poles or traffic signal poles on reasonable terms and conditions, including reasonable aesthetic and safety standards.
AB and SB Legislature for California.
Categories
Digital Divide Positive Change

National Core WIFI Broadband Wired & Wireless 🌎

Connect to the World California

 “Digital Equity Strategy” presented by SANDAG

Hello, ACE21.org has been participating with National Core on WIFI for all of California.

We are close to acquiring a WIFI system for the state of California.

How many of you lack a proper WIFI connection in the City of Chino?

What has the leadership of the City Council and its Mayor done to provide the city with proper WIFI?

The answer, nothing? The entire council and Mayor do not carry.

View the presentation on WIFI by National Core & Sandbag. ACE21.org has been participating with the webinars for over six months. What about the leadership of the city Council of Chino and the Mayor? No participation!

Categories
SCAG

Go Human: Traffic Safety & Public Health

Click Link Below to View Presentation

20210624_trafficsafety_publichealth.pdf (ca.gov)

Categories
SCAG

Go Human Types of Equity Built Environments Combined

Click Link to open PDF.

🥸

https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/scag_tspe5_equity_built_environment_combined_ppt.pdf

Categories
SCAG

SCAG Data Services & Requests

DATA SERVICES & REQUESTS

The SCAG Data Services Program was initiated and organized starting in the late 1980s with the goal of being the preeminent source of information for the southern California region. The purpose of the program is to derive and promote a model policy for distributing geospatial data and other information developed and maintained at SCAG. We believe so strongly in providing this service to stakeholders that we have incorporated this philosophy into our Ten Year Strategic Plan.

Our services are available to government agencies and private businesses without any fees. Our information is used by local government, public agencies, consultants, academia, students and the general public. Our information is designed for use in plans, studies, analyses, and presentations.

When it comes to researching and analyzing, accuracy of the data is considered as one of the main components. This particular program is designed to organize and maintain our datasets in a way that it helps interested parties to efficiently utilize the data.

OUR PROGRAM GOALS ARE:
  • Users of geographic information and data will gain better access to needed data
  • Local governments and public agencies will partner with SCAG on data standardization
  • Local governments will find more, and diversified, users for their data
  • Local governments and SCAG will realize cost savings through data sharing and through the establishment of consortiums when feasible
  • Data maintenance, update, and metadata documentation will become accepted as part of the normal data distribution business process
  • The maintenance of this program is spearheaded through the Research and Analysis department under the Land Use and Environmental Planning division at SCAG.

SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA RESOURCES & LINKS

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics provides local and national information on employment related statistics, including inflation and prices, productivity, unemployment, pay and benefits, employment projections, and spending and time usage.

U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis has information on gross domestic product (GDP), consumer spending, corporate profits, and journey to work data.

U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics provides transportation related data on rail, transit, maritime, aviation, and highways.

Demographic Research Unit at the California Department of Finance has detailed information on related to population in California, including age, race/ethnicity, gender, housing units, amongst many others variables.

U.S. Census Bureau’s American Fact Finder allows users to access data from recent Decennial Censuses and American Community Surveys. Information available varies from general population data, immigration data, employment related data, and housing data.

Requesting Model Data

To request model data, requestors are asked to complete the Model Data Request Form. Please be specific on the data requested, horizon years, and purpose of the request. For additional information about SCAG’s Model, please see the following report: SCAG Regional Travel Demand Model and 2008 Model Validation. Also see Proper Use of Model Data for additional background information regarding the proper use of model data obtained from SCAG.

For questions concerning model data requests and/or to return the completed Data Request Form, please contact Cheryl Leising at (213) 236-1926 or email at Leising@scag.ca.gov.SCAG GIS OPEN DATA PORTALDiscover, Examine, and Download Geographic Information Systems (GIS) data managed by SCAGREQUEST MODEL DATA