What does this all mean? Sit down, listen and have a bag of popcorn
Month: April 2021
RHNA
What does RHNA mean for all Cities? What are the plans for the City of Chino to implement RHNA and positive change for all the residents?
The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) is mandated by California State Housing Law as part of the periodic process of updating local housing elements of the General Plan. RHNA quantifies the need for housing within each jurisdiction during specified planning periods. SCAG adopted the 6th cycle RHNA allocation plan which covers the planning period October 2021 through October 2029.
The City of Chino is required to use RHNA in land use planning, prioritizing local resource allocation, and in deciding how to address identified existing and future housing needs resulting from population, employment, and household growth. RHNA has the collective objective for the region and subregion to grow in ways that enhances quality of life, improves access to jobs, promotes transportation mobility, and addresses social equity and fair share housing needs.
To meet the RHNA requirements the City of Chino needs to update their Housing Elements and local zoning to show how they will accommodate their share of the RHNA allocation over the 2021-29-time frame.
Responsibility of the City of Chino with respect to RHNA are:
- Specify goals, policies, quantified objectives, financial resources, and constraints for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing for all income levels.
- Identify sites for housing and provide an inventory of land suitable and available for residential development, including vacant sites and sites having potential for redevelopment.
- Analyze special housing needs, such as those of the elderly; persons with disabilities, including a developmental disability; large families; farmworkers; families with female heads of households; and families and persons in need of emergency shelter.
- Demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental and nongovernmental constraints that hinder locality from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities, supportive housing, transitional housing, and emergency shelters.
- Analyze existing affordable units at risk of converting to market-rate due to expiring subsidies or affordability contracts.
- Assess existing fair housing issues and strategies for affirmatively furthering fair housing.
So, what are the consequences of a community not meeting RHNA requirements:
- State Housing Element Law requires that jurisdictions plan for all types of housing based on the allocations they receive from the RHNA process by planning, in the form of having a compliant housing element, and submitting housing element annual progress reports, as a threshold or points-related requirement for certain funding programs (SB 1 Sustainable Community Planning Grants, SB 2 Planning Grants and Permanent Local Housing Allocation, etc.). Late submission of a housing element can result in a jurisdiction being required to submit a four-year update to their housing element.
- HCD may refer jurisdictions to the Attorney General if they do not have a compliant housing element, fail to comply with their HCD-approved housing element, or violate housing element law, the housing accountability act, density bonus law, no net loss law, or land use discrimination law. The consequences of those cases brought by the Attorney General are up to the courts but can include financial penalties.
- In addition, as the housing element is one of the required components of the general plan, a jurisdiction without a compliant housing element, may risk legal challenges to their general plan from interested parties outside of HCD.
- Local governments must also implement their commitments from the housing element, and the statute has several consequences for the lack of implementation. For example, failure to rezone in a timely manner may impact a local government’s land use authority and result in a carryover of RHNA to the next cycle. Failure to implement programs can also influence future housing element updates and requirements, such as program timing. HCD may investigate any action or lack of action in the housing element.
- For jurisdictions that did not issue permits for enough housing to keep pace consistent with RHNA building goals, a developer can elect to use a ministerial process to get project approval for residential projects that meet certain conditions. This, in effect, makes it easier to build housing in places that are not on target to meet their building goals.
GOVERNMENT CODE – GOV
TITLE 7. PLANNING AND LAND USE [65000 – 66499.58] (Heading of Title 7 amended by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536.)
DIVISION 1. PLANNING AND ZONING [65000 – 66301] (Heading of Division 1 added by Stats. 1974, Ch. 1536.)
CHAPTER 3. Local Planning [65100 – 65763] (Chapter 3 repealed and added by Stats. 1965, Ch. 1880.)
ARTICLE 10.6. Housing Elements [65580 – 65589.11] (Article 10.6 added by Stats. 1980, Ch. 1143.)
Early attainment of goals
- time is of the essence
- Is there a shortage of housing in California?
- Special attention to low- and moderate-income households
Availability of housing:
- decent housing,
- suitable living environment,
- for all economic levels
Local government focus:
Local and state governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community
each local government also has the responsibility to consider economic, environmental, and fiscal factors and community goals set forth in the general plan and to cooperate with other local governments and the state in addressing regional housing needs
Designating and maintaining a supply of land and adequate sites suitable, feasible, and available for the development of housing sufficient to meet the locality’s housing need for all income levels is essential to achieving the state’s housing goals and the purposes of this blog.
Housing/RHNA
What are the mandated housing laws? What is the cost to cities that do not follow the mandated housing laws?
Only 3% of California’s cities and counties are fully on track to meet state goals to build sufficient housing —and 30% are failing to issue permits at all for affordable housing.
The Southern California News Group used that data to create its second annual housing permit report card for all 539 cities and counties in the state. Only 33 were doing well enough to earn an A, while 96 got an F. The average grade was a C-. Of the more than 116,000 permits that jurisdictions reported issuing in 2019, the year cover by the most recent state data, 78% were for above-moderate income housing. A mere 13% were for moderate-income housing and 9% for low and very-low-income housing. Chino needs to build 6974 affordable dwellings.
Here are the RHNA numbers for Chino and Chino Hills:
Total: 6974
Very Low-Income, Low-Income, Moderate-Income, Above-Moderate Income
Chino 2113 1284 1203 2378
Chino Hills 3729 1388 821 789 731
Each jurisdiction’s total is divided into four categories:
–Very-low-income housing that would be affordable for people making less than half of the area’s median income
–Low-income housing for people making 51-80% of median income
–Moderate-income housing for people making 81-120% of median income
–Above-moderate-income housing for people making more than 120%of median income
The low and very low categories are what the state considers “affordable housing”
All Cities and Counties are required by law to adopt land use plans and zone enough land to accommodate their RHNA goals, but not to ensure homes are built—that’s up to developers.
Many cities lack the political motivation to build affordable housing, and residents like the way their hometowns are already like. The residents argue, “We do not want those kinds of people in our city. Or we do not want our city to look like South Chicago. Some residents go on to say, “The character of our city will change if we let Asians, Blacks, and more illegals into our city, we need to stop allowing those people from moving into our city, we need to close our city border”. City councilmembers, likewise, openly state that their city does not want those people moving into the city”. This is clearly against the law and un-American.
The lack of requirements to ensure affordable housing is built makes it easy for city councilmembers “to take the easy way out and deny development that might cause community concerns and their seat on the council, votes. Just pass the Buck and Blame, Blame, Blame!
Affordable housing, as part of a full spectrum of housing opportunities, helps support the local economics and workers—there’s no city that shouldn’t be concerned with nurturing their local economy, especially after COVID-19, and housing should be a part of that.
The city of Chino received a C- in fulfilling its RHNA obligations. And still with no plan. The entire city council seems to blame everyone including Santa Claus. The City Councilmember of Chino needs to work with the State and developers and look at their outdated zoning for the City to make changes. Chino is planning to build affordable housing on the borderlines of the City limits, like the saying goes, “Out of sight…Out of Mind”. The question arises, “Where will our children live?” Many individuals, between 18 and 41, young and old cannot afford rent and are living with their parents. I believe the city of Chino needs to embrace the 21st century and collaborate with the experts. The housing crisis is real according to the NLC (National League of Cities), LOCC (League of California Cities, National Core, and other organizations.
In a recent SOI (Sphere of Influence) meeting residents were given facts and figures from the city’s consultant and planning division. But not once did the city council mention any of the mandated affordable housing laws.
Now let us look at the San Bernardino County RHNA numbers:
What do the numbers tell us? If the City of Chino cannot annex county land, what happens to the SOI (Sphere of Influence), and Protect Chino group? Will the SOI and Protect Chino group tell the county what to do? Will the city of Chino tell the county what to build or what not to build?
Yes, the county of San Bernardino has its own obligation to meet RHNA. In my next blog, I will discuss these questions. Stay tuned.
SCAG 6TH CYCLE DRAFT RHNA ALLOCATION BASED ON FINAL RHNA METHODOLOGY & FINAL CONNECT SOCAL
9/3/20
County Total Very-low Low income Moderate Above
income income moderate
income
San Bernardino 137,786 35,575 21,855 24,087 56,269
Unincorporated 8,813 2,174 1,357 1,520 3,762
Indecisions Make Wrong Choices
After viewing the March 16, Chino Council meeting, it was business as usual. Honors were recognized for contributions and service from a long time Chino resident of the City, Home beatification, promotions for police and firefighters, and the number of prayer meetings, breakfast and luncheons attended.
No discussion and explanation were offered by the Councils’
leadership for the mandated RHNA housing elements the City of Chino must meet. One councilmember mentioned that residents do not want high density, or the city wants to keep as close to its general plan. There are also many residents that do not want streetlights. We should ask how many residents were surveyed, and when were these residents surveyed to determine if the survey has validity. In so thinking, this councilmember does not understand that the general plan for Chino is not written in stone, the general plans are not the Ten Commandments, but a guide that changes with time to meet the needs of the residents. Likewise, the general plan has not been updated in over fifteen years. At that time there were more cows than people. The entire council meeting is simple with no substance and follows the same pattern for each council meeting. It reminds me of the old saying, “Monkey See, Monkey Do.”
Blaming the state, SCAG, county, and others would change the
‘character of the city’ and as the leadership of the council specified,
‘we will not let that happen’. The council in one council meeting
affirmed, “Chino will not become another South Chicago.” The state
Supreme court of California has outlawed ‘redlining’, stereotyping
individuals by ethnicity, religion, gender identity, language, and race.
The old days of creating ghettos, barrios, Asian Pacific islanders (AAPI), communities, and separate living areas for minorities is over. People of all cultural backgrounds need to be included in all communities: E Pluribus Unum.
A closer look at the demographics of Chino, reveals that Chino is very
diverse, and rich with numerous composites, beliefs, and customs.
The council does not review with the residents the consequence that
AB101 enunciates that the city is closer to being fined by the state
anywhere from $10,000 to $100,000 a month for not complying with
the affordable housing law. The city of Huntington Beach recently lost
their case against conforming to the state laws for building affordable
housing. The city of Huntington Beach was fined a large amount of
money. This precedence puts the city of Chino in the crosshairs of not
winning in a court case. The housing crisis is valid and needs to be
addressed.
The housing crisis is a national crisis as scrutinized by the National
League of Cities, NALEO, HELO, League of California Cities, SCAG and many more well-thought-of organizations.
The city attorney was given the task to update the leaders of the
council when any word on the RHNA numbers comes up. That seems
to throw the responsibility to the city attorney to eventually blame.
The actual responsibility lies on the city council leadership to make
the right pronouncements and comply with the law, for the sake of
equity and change.
The city leaders prefer to put their heads in the sand and not tell the
resident the consequences of not complying with the RHNA numbers.
The situation seems best that the council leaders simply say the truth.
Now the city leaders are asking state officials Senator Leyva and
Assemblyman Rodriguez to intervene. Wow, if that could be so easy to
change the state laws. However, why not discuss and inform the
residents that Chino’s final appeal to the state have already been
reviewed and without any altering, with no change. It may be best to
come up with a plan and smart solutions rather than hope the RHNA
numbers will magically transform and disappear. Dr. Jay Prag’s recent
article articulates the fiscal loss and Russian roulette maneuvers the
city has put themselves in quite a predicament for their obstinateness
for positive change.
As history has taught us, human beings will continue to show
culpability of others and reiterate mistakes for their incompetency to
not lead with the facts and truth, to not follow the laws, and make
wrong choices. The council has a way out by putting the guilt on the
Devil. The leaders of the city council can always fall back on and
point out that “The Devil made us do it.”